We Run Our Business on Referrals
Fresh Projects is a UK-based software platform designed for architects, engineers, and other built-environment professionals to manage financial aspects of their projects. It helps teams track fees, timesheets, expenses, billing, and overall profitability to keep projects on budget and profitable. The platform also centralises project data, streamlines administrative tasks, and offers mobile app support for easy access and updates.
1a Colinette Road
London
SW15 6QG
© 2026 Fresh Projects
Product
We Run Our Business on Referrals
Fresh Projects is a UK-based software platform designed for architects, engineers, and other built-environment professionals to manage financial aspects of their projects. It helps teams track fees, timesheets, expenses, billing, and overall profitability to keep projects on budget and profitable. The platform also centralises project data, streamlines administrative tasks, and offers mobile app support for easy access and updates.
1a Colinette Road
London
SW15 6QG
© 2026 Fresh Projects
Product
Comparisons
Comparisons
Comparisons
These comparisons are written for architecture and engineering practices with 20–100+ staff who are already using a project or practice management platform and are starting to question whether it still supports how they work today.
Each comparison focuses on real-world experience (adoption, day-to-day use, and trust in the data) to help you understand whether your current setup is still the right fit, or whether a change could give you clearer visibility and confidence as your practice grows.
These comparisons are written for architecture and engineering practices with 20–100+ staff who are already using a project or practice management platform and are starting to question whether it still supports how they work today.
Each comparison focuses on real-world experience (adoption, day-to-day use, and trust in the data) to help you understand whether your current setup is still the right fit, or whether a change could give you clearer visibility and confidence as your practice grows.
Comparisons
Comparisons
Comparisons
These comparisons are written for architecture and engineering practices with 20–100+ staff who are already using a project or practice management platform and are starting to question whether it still supports how they work today.
Each comparison focuses on real-world experience (adoption, day-to-day use, and trust in the data) to help you understand whether your current setup is still the right fit, or whether a change could give you clearer visibility and confidence as your practice grows.
These comparisons are written for architecture and engineering practices with 20–100+ staff who are already using a project or practice management platform and are starting to question whether it still supports how they work today.
Each comparison focuses on real-world experience (adoption, day-to-day use, and trust in the data) to help you understand whether your current setup is still the right fit, or whether a change could give you clearer visibility and confidence as your practice grows.
Comparisons
Comparisons
Comparisons
These comparisons are written for architecture and engineering practices with 20–100+ staff who are already using a project or practice management platform and are starting to question whether it still supports how they work today.
Each comparison focuses on real-world experience (adoption, day-to-day use, and trust in the data) to help you understand whether your current setup is still the right fit, or whether a change could give you clearer visibility and confidence as your practice grows.
These comparisons are written for architecture and engineering practices with 20–100+ staff who are already using a project or practice management platform and are starting to question whether it still supports how they work today.
Each comparison focuses on real-world experience (adoption, day-to-day use, and trust in the data) to help you understand whether your current setup is still the right fit, or whether a change could give you clearer visibility and confidence as your practice grows.
Comparisons
Comparisons
Comparisons
These comparisons are written for architecture and engineering practices with 20–100+ staff who are already using a project or practice management platform and are starting to question whether it still supports how they work today.
Each comparison focuses on real-world experience (adoption, day-to-day use, and trust in the data) to help you understand whether your current setup is still the right fit, or whether a change could give you clearer visibility and confidence as your practice grows.
These comparisons are written for architecture and engineering practices with 20–100+ staff who are already using a project or practice management platform and are starting to question whether it still supports how they work today.
Each comparison focuses on real-world experience (adoption, day-to-day use, and trust in the data) to help you understand whether your current setup is still the right fit, or whether a change could give you clearer visibility and confidence as your practice grows.
Comparisons
Comparisons
Comparisons
These comparisons are written for architecture and engineering practices with 20–100+ staff who are already using a project or practice management platform and are starting to question whether it still supports how they work today.
Each comparison focuses on real-world experience (adoption, day-to-day use, and trust in the data) to help you understand whether your current setup is still the right fit, or whether a change could give you clearer visibility and confidence as your practice grows.
These comparisons are written for architecture and engineering practices with 20–100+ staff who are already using a project or practice management platform and are starting to question whether it still supports how they work today.
Each comparison focuses on real-world experience (adoption, day-to-day use, and trust in the data) to help you understand whether your current setup is still the right fit, or whether a change could give you clearer visibility and confidence as your practice grows.
Comparisons
Comparisons
Comparisons
These comparisons are written for architecture and engineering practices with 20–100+ staff who are already using a project or practice management platform and are starting to question whether it still supports how they work today.
Each comparison focuses on real-world experience (adoption, day-to-day use, and trust in the data) to help you understand whether your current setup is still the right fit, or whether a change could give you clearer visibility and confidence as your practice grows.
These comparisons are written for architecture and engineering practices with 20–100+ staff who are already using a project or practice management platform and are starting to question whether it still supports how they work today.
Each comparison focuses on real-world experience (adoption, day-to-day use, and trust in the data) to help you understand whether your current setup is still the right fit, or whether a change could give you clearer visibility and confidence as your practice grows.
Comparisons
Comparisons
Comparisons
These comparisons are written for architecture and engineering practices with 20–100+ staff who are already using a project or practice management platform and are starting to question whether it still supports how they work today.
Each comparison focuses on real-world experience (adoption, day-to-day use, and trust in the data) to help you understand whether your current setup is still the right fit, or whether a change could give you clearer visibility and confidence as your practice grows.
These comparisons are written for architecture and engineering practices with 20–100+ staff who are already using a project or practice management platform and are starting to question whether it still supports how they work today.
Each comparison focuses on real-world experience (adoption, day-to-day use, and trust in the data) to help you understand whether your current setup is still the right fit, or whether a change could give you clearer visibility and confidence as your practice grows.
CMAP vs Fresh Projects
A structured, enterprise-leaning platform commonly adopted by professional services firms in the built environment as they formalise operations and governance.
A structured, enterprise-leaning platform commonly adopted by professional services firms in the built environment as they formalise operations and governance.
Total Synergy vs Fresh Projects
A broad, feature-rich practice management platform often chosen by professional services firms in the built environment seeking an all-in-one system.
A broad, feature-rich practice management platform often chosen by professional services firms in the built environment seeking an all-in-one system.
Deltek Vantagepoint vs Fresh Projects
A long-established, finance-led ERP platform widely used by professional services firms in the built environment to manage projects, finance and payroll within a single system.
A long-established, finance-led ERP platform widely used by professional services firms in the built environment to manage projects, finance and payroll within a single system.
Deltek Union Square/PIM vs Fresh Projects
Deltek Union Square, now known as Deltek PIM, is an ERP-style platform used by some architecture, engineering and multidisciplinary firms within professional services in the built environment. Many practices reviewing the system today are reassessing whether its complexity still supports clear visibility into project performance.
Deltek Union Square, now known as Deltek PIM, is an ERP-style platform used by some architecture, engineering and multidisciplinary firms within professional services in the built environment. Many practices reviewing the system today are reassessing whether its complexity still supports clear visibility into project performance.
WorkflowMax vs Fresh Projects
See why A&E firms switch from WorkflowMax to improve profitability, forecasting and project control
See why A&E firms switch from WorkflowMax to improve profitability, forecasting and project control
Monograph vs Fresh Projects
Monograph is a practice operations platform primarily focused on project tracking, staffing allocation and high-level financial oversight. It is often adopted by design-led firms looking to introduce more structured project visibility beyond spreadsheets.
Monograph is a practice operations platform primarily focused on project tracking, staffing allocation and high-level financial oversight. It is often adopted by design-led firms looking to introduce more structured project visibility beyond spreadsheets.
Projectworks vs Fresh Projects
Projectworks is a cloud-based professional services automation platform focused on time tracking, resource scheduling and project administration across consultancy businesses. It is commonly adopted by firms looking to introduce stronger operational structure and utilisation visibility as they move beyond spreadsheets and informal systems.
Projectworks is a cloud-based professional services automation platform focused on time tracking, resource scheduling and project administration across consultancy businesses. It is commonly adopted by firms looking to introduce stronger operational structure and utilisation visibility as they move beyond spreadsheets and informal systems.
Ready to see how it works?
Ready to see how it works?
Ready to see how it works?
We Run Our Business on Referrals
Fresh Projects is a UK-based software platform designed for architects, engineers, and other built-environment professionals to manage financial aspects of their projects. It helps teams track fees, timesheets, expenses, billing, and overall profitability to keep projects on budget and profitable. The platform also centralises project data, streamlines administrative tasks, and offers mobile app support for easy access and updates.
1a Colinette Road
London
SW15 6QG
© 2026 Fresh Projects
Product
